RetractionWatch: CEO of AI company loses paper on cognitive impact of generative AI
Interview for “Credible Research: Social Science Studies Often Not Replicable.” Deutschlandfunk, Forschung aktuell, April 2026. [with S. Grinschgl]
Interview for NZZ: “Those who constantly ask ChatGPT get less practice in critical thinking. Does artificial intelligence undermine human intelligence?”, Zurich, July 2025. https://www.nzz.ch/technologie/nur-chat-gpt-uebt-sich-weniger-im-kritischen-denken-untergraebt-die-kuenstliche-intelligenz-die-menschliche-ld.1891568 [with S. Grinschgl]
Science magazine coverage of analytic flexibility work: https://www.science.org/content/article/ai-generated-participants-can-lead-social-science-experiments-astray-study-finds
NYT coverage of analytic flexibility work: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/06/opinion/ai-polling.html
Mother Jones coverage of analytic flexibility work: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/03/polling-artificial-intelligence-democracy-market-research-ai-surveys/
Sciences Critiques coverage of analytic flexibility work: https://sciences-critiques.fr/une-recherche-en-sciences-humaines-sans-humains/
UniAktuell coverage of RegCheck with Jamie Cummins: https://www.uniaktuell.unibe.ch/2026/berner_ki_tool_fuer_eine_verlaesslichere_forschung/index_ger.html
Bennett coverage of Jamie Cummins research visit and CodeBot: https://www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/blog/2026/06/six-months-at-the-bennett-institute-reflections-on-ai-assisted-tools-research-integrity-and-future-collaboration/
APS Observer interview on AI in science: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/ai-revolution-or-revulsion.html
